life sciences

Quantum computing uses quantum mechanics principles to solve certain complex mathematical problems faster than classical computers.  Whilst classical computers use binary “bits” to perform calculations, quantum computers use quantum bits (“qubits”).  The value of a bit can only be zero or one, whereas a qubit can exist as zero, one, or a combination of both states (a phenomenon known as superposition) allowing quantum computers to solve certain problems exponentially faster than classical computers.

The potential applications of quantum computing are wide-ranging and industry-agnostic. For instance, they could be used to enhance the analysis of large, complex data sets, optimize supply-chain processes, and enhance artificial intelligence (“AI”) technologies and improve machine learning algorithms.

Given the potential applications, quantum computing could have a significant impact on companies in the life sciences sector, and more specifically could be used to improve:Continue Reading Quantum Computing and its Impact on the Life Science Industry

The joint procurement by the European Commission (“Commission”) and the Member States of COVID-19 vaccines and therapeutics presented a significant milestone in the EU’s management of the pandemic.  In the aftermath of the pandemic, there have been repeated calls for more joint procurement.  This blog explores the existing mechanisms for joint procurement and also considers the Commission’s proposal for a Critical Medicines Act (“CMA”) and what it would mean for public procurement.

At a high level, there are already various mechanisms for joint procurement of medicinal products and medical devices both with and without involvement of the Commission.  The CMA proposal does not fundamentally change that but rather supplements the existing regimes.

The key aspect to be aware of is that both the existing regime and the draft CMA merely establish a framework for joint procurement, including the relationship among Member States and the Commission (if involved).  This framework focusses on establishing when joint procurement is possible and the mechanism for getting a joint procurement set up.  However, the framework does not specify in what circumstances Member States and/or the Commission might choose to engage in joint procurement, the terms of the tender or any resulting contract.Continue Reading EU Joint Procurement – An Overview

On 30 January 2025, the UK Government announced the re-launch of the Innovative Licensing and Access Pathway (“ILAP”) for medicines.

The ILAP is an “end-to-end” access pathway offering a unique opportunity for a medicine’s developer to engage with: (i) the UK’s medicines regulator – the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (“MHRA”); (ii) England’s HTA body – the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (“NICE”); and (iii) and the National Health Service (“NHS”) (together the “ILAP Partners”).  By providing medicines developers with joined-up, co-ordinated and tailored guidance from the ILAP Partners, from the early stages of clinical development, the ILAP scheme hopes to accelerate the time to market for innovative and transformative medicines and drug-device combinations.Continue Reading Re-Launch of UK’s Innovative Licensing and Access Pathway (“ILAP”)

The UK’s Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (“MHRA”) is seeking industry feedback on its new draft guideline on individual messenger ribonucleic acid (“mRNA”) cancer immunotherapies (the “Draft Guidance”).  Building on the success of mRNA vaccine technology in response to the Covid-19 pandemic, the technology is now being adapted to target diseases such as cancer.  The MHRA aims to provide a streamlined robust regulatory framework for the approval of such personalised mRNA-based cancer vaccines without compromising safety.

The Draft Guidance covers the regulatory classification of these novel cancer treatments, product design and manufacture, non-clinical and clinical development, pharmacovigilance and the distribution of information to the wider public.  Notably, the MHRA explicitly acknowledges that the regulatory and scientific principles discussed in the Draft Guidance could broadly apply to other disease indications or technologies that could benefit from personalisation or individualisation.  Therefore, industry should be aware that the scope of the Draft Guidance may be extended in the future beyond mRNA cancer immunotherapies that use lipid nanoparticle delivery systems to other delivery systems and disease areas.  Manufacturers, developers, patient organisations and other stakeholders have until 31 March 2025 to comment on the Draft Guidance.

We explore some of the interesting regulatory considerations arising from the Draft Guidance below.Continue Reading MHRA Consultation on Individualised mRNA Cancer Immunotherapies – Unique opportunity for a streamlined risk based regulatory framework?

On 23 January 2025, we hosted the 2025 edition of the Covington European Life Sciences Symposium. The Symposium brought together colleagues from London, Brussels, Frankfurt and Dublin with our industry connections to explore the evolving challenges and opportunities facing the European life sciences sector.Continue Reading The Covington European Life Sciences Symposium 2025

On 18 December 2024, the European Commission published a proposed implementing regulation relating to pharmacovigilance (“PV”) requirements for human medicines marketed in the EU (“Proposal”), which will update European Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 520/2012 (“Implementing Regulation”).  While the core PV requirements, including the obligation to establish and operate a PV system and the key reporting requirements, are set out in Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 and Directive 2001/83/EC, the Implementing Regulation provides detailed requirements on the performance of PV activities, including the need for a PV system master file (“PSMF”), more comprehensive requirements for the PV quality system, and detailed provisions relating to periodic safety update reports (“PSURs”). 

The proposed changes aim to harmonize the performance of PV activities by marketing authorization holders (“MAHs”), national competent authorities and the European Medicines Agency (“EMA”), and in some cases widen the scope of the Implementing Regulation’s PV requirements.  Other changes are clarificatory in nature.Continue Reading European Commission Consults on Update to Pharmacovigilance Rules

In recent weeks, the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (“MHRA”) has published further guidance relating to the implementation of the Windsor Framework.  From 1 January 2025, changes due to the Windsor Framework for the licensing, labelling and wholesale dealing of human medicinal products in the UK will become effective.  The new measures require, amongst other things: (i) all human medicinal products intended for the UK market to be authorized by the MHRA; (ii) a single UK-wide pack that bears a “UK only” label; and (iii) disapplication of the EU Falsified Medicines Directive 2011/62/EU (“EU FMD”) requirements to UK-wide packs. 

Following the MHRA’s initial publication of guidance focusing on the changes to labelling and packaging (please see our blog post here), the Agency has now issued guidance relating to wholesalers and manufacturers (“Wholesaler and Manufacturer Guidance), licensing (“Licensing Guidance”) and advertising (“Advertising Guidance”).

We explore some of the key requirements and recommendations for supply chains and promotional material arising from this new guidance below.Continue Reading Are you Windsor Framework ready? A focus on pharmaceutical supply chains and promotional material

In an earlier blog, we had reported on an interesting litigation case concerning the legal scope of the market exclusivity right for orphan drugs in the EU. Meanwhile, there have been further developments in this court case and its key questions have now been referred to the European Court

Continue Reading European Court of Justice requested to clarify the scope of the market exclusivity right for orphan drugs – German courts remain divided

On 1 July 2024, Germany has enacted stricter requirements for the processing of health data when using cloud-computing services. The new Section 393 SGB V aims to establish a uniform standard for the use of cloud-computing services in the statutory healthcare system which covers around 90% of the German population. In this blog

Continue Reading Germany enacts stricter requirements for the processing of Health Data using Cloud-Computing – with potential side effects for Medical Research with Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices

Last week, on 4 July 2024, the German Parliament (Bundestag) has passed significant changes to the country’s drug pricing and reimbursement laws. Just six months after the German Federal Health Ministry (BMG) presented a first draft bill for a “Medical Research Act” (Medizinforschungsgesetz or MFG), the German

Continue Reading Germany amends drug pricing and reimbursement laws with “Medical Research Act” – Drug pricing becomes intertwined with local clinical research expectations