This article was originally posted on our sister blog Inside Medical Devices The EU Regulatory Committee on Medical Devices recently voted in favor of the European Commission’s draft decision on the classification of cranberry products (the “Cranberry Decision”). In essence, the Cranberry Decision provides that cranberry products intended to prevent or treat cystitis and that … Continue Reading
This article was originally posted on our sister blog Inside Medical Devices Earlier this week, in a plenary vote, the EU Parliament endorsed the texts of the Regulation on Medical Devices (the “Regulation”—latest version available here) and the parallel Regulation on In-Vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices (the “IVD Regulation”—latest version available here). This presents a good … Continue Reading
This article was originally posted on our sister blog Inside Medical Devices The term “industrial scale” appears twice in the draft EU Medical Devices Regulation (“MD Regulation”) in relation to so-called “in-house devices.” The term equally appears in the draft in-vitro diagnostic medical devices (“IVD”) Regulation. To provide perspective on the meaning of “industrial scale” … Continue Reading
This article was originally posted on our sister blog Inside Medical Devices On October 5, 2015, after three years of continued discussions and negotiations on the modernization of EU medical devices and IVD rules, the Council of Ministers of the EU countries (“the Council”) agreed on a full General Approach on the review of the … Continue Reading
This post was originally published on our sister blog Inside Medical Devices. On June 19th, 2015, the Council of EU Ministers reached a partial General Approach on the review of the medical devices and in vitro medical devices (IVD) rules in the EU (an overview of the texts is accessible here). The General Approach does … Continue Reading
This article was originally published on our sister blog InsidePrivacy May 2015 saw a number of developments in the EU mHealth sector worthy of a brief mention. The European Commission announced that it would work on new guidance for mHealth apps, despite the European Data Protection Supervisor and British Standards Institution publishing their own just … Continue Reading
A more detailed analysis of the impact of the work at the CJEU is featured in Clinica Medtech Intelligence. Liability Spotlight now on the Notified Bodies Background and Context The so-called PIP-Breast-implant scandal now reaches the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). As last week a German court referred a liability case to … Continue Reading
On 21 January 2015, the European Medicines Agency (“EMA”) launched a public consultation on how the transparency rules of Regulation EU No 536/2014 (the “Clinical Trials Regulation”) should apply to the new clinical trials database. The consultation document of the EMA discusses the practical application of the new transparency rules, sets different options on the … Continue Reading
This post originally appeared on our sister blog, InsideMedicalDevices. The UK Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has launched an informal survey of current practices relating to the use of data-enabled medical devices and apps. The short and anonymous survey explores whether organisations have put in place specific policies and procedures, asset registers, IT security requirements for … Continue Reading
On 20 November 2014 the German Supreme Administrative Court (Bundesverwaltungsgericht, “BVerwG”) confirmed that nicotine-containing liquids that are vaporised and inhaled via e-cigarettes are not medicines and therefore e-cigarettes are not medical devices.… Continue Reading
This post was originally published on our sister blog Inside Medical Devices. On 18 July 2014, the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) announced that it will create a new independent Devices Expert Advisory Committee (DEAC) before April 2015. The DEAC will be responsible for providing independent expert advice to help the MHRA regulate medical devices. … Continue Reading
The European Commission’s Borderline and Classification Medical Devices Expert Group has published a new version of its Manual on Borderline and Classification in the Community Regulatory Framework for Medical Devices. The updated manual includes a new section on software and mobile applications reflecting the growing industry of medical device software. The manual also provides new … Continue Reading
In August last year, we wrote about the extent to which the French “sunshine rules” apply to the medical devices industry (see our post), alongside the pharmaceutical and cosmetic industry, and other health-related industries. A number of developments have occurred since then. First, we highlighted in our previous post the uncertainty regarding the territorial scope … Continue Reading
In February 2014, the MHRA published new guidance on borderline medical devices. The guidance considers only medical devices within the terms of the Medical Device Directive and not the Active Implantable Medical Devices Directive or In Vitro Medical Devices Directive. Purpose and mode of action The MHRA makes clear that borderline determinations “will be based on the stated intended purpose of … Continue Reading
Last month, the International Medical Device Regulators Forum (IMDRF) reached a consensus on a potentially key aspect of the future regulation of medical software in the US, the EU, Brazil, Canada and Japan, that is, a harmonized definition of when stand-alone software will be considered to be a medical device. This category of software, dubbed … Continue Reading
A call for expression of interest addressed to healthcare product developers who would be interested in engaging in early dialogues (EDs) with Health Technology Assessment (HTA) bodies was launched in December 2013 and will stay open until October 2014. The call concerns developers of both medicinal products and medical devices. The European Commission defines HTA … Continue Reading
Privacy Impact Assessments (PIAs) or data protection impact assessments used to be discussed in the context of specific technologies or industry sectors (see, for instance, the European Commission’s recommendations in relation to applications supported by radio-frequency identification (RFID) and the development of smart grids). However, this situation is about to change. PIAs are increasingly being promoted by … Continue Reading
This post originally appeared on our sister blog, InsideMedicalDevices. At the end of May 2013, the French government released the long awaited Decree implementing the 2011 French Sunshine Act. The Decree requires companies to publicly disclose — in French — any benefit over 10 Euros and agreements (except commercial ones) concluded with healthcare professionals or other actors active in the … Continue Reading
This post originally appeared on our sister blog, InsideMedicalDevices. As announced in our previous post, the rapporteur (i.e., the leader of the parliamentary process) for the new Regulation on medical devices, Mrs. Dagmar ROTH-BEHRENDT, has proposed the introduction of a pharma-like pre-marketing authorization regime for high risk medical devices in the EU. In her recent report submitted to the ENVI Committee of the European Parliament (the parliamentary committee … Continue Reading
The Spanish Ministry of Health has published a draft Royal Decree on Clinical Trials, which the Spanish government is expected to adopt by the end of this year. Once adopted, the new Royal Decree will replace Royal Decree 223/2004 on Clinical Trials and will regulate all clinical trials with medicines and medical devices in Spain. … Continue Reading
On May 30, 2013, Advocate General Sharpston delivered an opinion on a request for a preliminary ruling from the Finnish national courts concerning the laws governing reclassification of medical devices (Advocate General: Opinion, Case C-109/12). The Advocate General’s opinion does not bind the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). However, in the majority … Continue Reading
On 5 April, 2013 the European Commission adopted a recommendation on a common framework for a unique device identification (UDI) system in the EU. The hope is that a harmonized UDI system will facilitate device safety monitoring and reporting, recalls and other field safety corrective actions. It will also help avoid device-related medical errors and injuries … Continue Reading
This post originally appeared on our sister blog, InsideMedicalDevices. Unlike in the US, medical devices in the EU are not subject to a premarket authorization by a competent authority but instead to a conformity assessment procedure. For low-risk devices, the manufacturer conducts this conformity assessment procedure, whereas for medium and high risk devices, independent third parties, so-called “Notified … Continue Reading
This post originally appeared on our sister blog, InsideMedicalDevices. Following recent developments regarding breast implants and metal-on-metal hip joint replacements, the European Parliament (EP) adopted a resolution calling for safer medical devices and the introduction of a marketing authorization system for high-risk devices. While the Commission has not endorsed the EP’s resolution for a premarket authorization system in its Proposal for a new EU medical devices’ … Continue Reading
