The European Commission announced today (16 December) its plans to simplify the existing EU regulatory framework for medical devices and in vitro diagnostic medical devices (“IVDs”).  Many industry stakeholders have criticized the current EU device rules as being slow, costly, unpredictable, and unnecessarily complex. Under the proposed revisions, the Commission aims to make the rules “easier, faster and more effective and further promote competitiveness, innovation and a high-level of patient safety.

The proposal includes a new regulation (“Proposed Regulation”) to amend certain provisions under the EU Medical Devices Regulation (EU) 2017/745 (“MDR”) and IVD Regulation (EU) 2017/746 (“IVDR”) (among other legislation), which govern device regulations across the EU.  The Proposed Regulation marks a significant, but early, step in the legislative process.  At this stage it is simply a proposal.  It will need to be considered by the European Parliament and the Council, and will only take effect if formally adopted – likely with revisions.  As a result, we do not anticipate that any changes will come into force until at least the end of 2026, depending on the speed of the legislative process. 

That said, the Proposed Regulation includes various proposals that may be significant for medical device manufacturers, as well as the device and diagnostics industry more broadly.  We highlight the key proposed amendments below, and will provide further detail on specific aspects of the Proposed Regulation in future blogs as we continue to digest its content and impact.

  • Amendment to classification rules for MDSW. Rule 11 of the classification rules in Annex VIII of the MDR relating to medical device software (“MDSW”) will be amended, potentially allowing a broader range of MDSW to fall under a Class I classification and therefore not require a Notified Body assessment.  This change could also impact the relevance of the EU AI Act to AI MDSW and potentially reduce the number of AI MDSW deemed “high risk” under the AI Act.
  • Reduction in re-certification requirements. Devices that undergo assessment by a Notified Body currently require re-certification at least every five years. The Proposed Regulation would remove the current five-year cap on the validity of Notified Body certificates of conformity.
  • Expanding the use of eIFUs. Currently, IVDs (other than software IVDs) may only use electronic instructions for use (“eIFUs”) instead of paper-based versions where the IVD does not involve near-patient testing and is intended for professional use. Under the Proposed Regulation, professional use IVDs for near-patient testing may also use eIFUs.
  • International reliance and cooperation. The Proposed Regulation lays the groundwork for global regulatory convergence by promoting international cooperation, such as through the EU’s participation in the Medical Device Single Audit Program (“MDSAP”).  This is an international initiative that allows a single regulatory audit of a manufacturer’s quality management system to satisfy the requirements of multiple jurisdictions.  Current jurisdictions that recognise MDSAP audits are the U.S., Australia, Brazil, Canada and Japan.
  • Expansion of the provisions for in-house devices.Articles 5(5) of the MDR and IVDR, respectively, provide specific rules for devices/IVDs that are manufactured and used only in EU health institutions.  These rules essentially provide an exemption to CE marking, subject to the satisfaction of several conditions, including that the devices/IVDs cannot be transferred from the health institution.  The Proposed Regulation seeks to make the conditions more flexible, such as by permitting the transfer of such in-house devices if this is in the interest of patient safety or public health, or to prepare for or respond to a public health emergency.  Further, with respect to the IVDR, the Proposed Regulation provides for the removal of the condition that there be no equivalent device on the market that could appropriately meet the target patient group’s particular needs.
  • Regulatory sandboxes. Under the Proposed Regulation, the European Commission and Members States will have the ability to establish “regulatory sandboxes” to target emerging technologies, subject to the oversight of a relevant Member State competent authority.  The Proposed Regulation defines a “regulatory sandbox” as:

a controlled environment set up by a competent authority which offers manufacturers or prospective manufacturers the possibility to develop, test, validate and use, where appropriate in real-world conditions, an innovative product or technology potentially falling within the scope of this Regulation, pursuant to a sandbox plan for a limited time under regulatory supervision.”

  • New special pathways for orphan and breakthrough innovations. The Proposed Regulation introduces new criteria for conformity assessments for breakthrough devices and orphan devices. 
    • Devices are considered “breakthrough” if they are expected to introduce “a high degree of novelty” and “a significant positive clinical impact on patients or public health, for a life-threatening or irreversibly debilitating disease or condition.
    • Devices will be treated as “orphan devices” if they (a) are intended for the treatment, diagnosis, or prevention of a disease or condition that presents in not more than 12,000 individuals in the EU per year; and (b) at least one of the following criteria is met: (i) there are insufficient available alternatives, or (ii) the device is expected to provide a clinical benefit compared to available alternatives or the state of the art, taking into account both device-specific factors and patient population-specific factors.
    • Where medical devices/IVDs meet the above criteria – as determined by an expert panel – the Proposed Regulation provides that Notified Bodies must prioritize their conformity assessments and, where appropriate, apply a rolling review to compress assessment timelines.
    • The Proposed Regulation also envisages that manufacturers of such devices/IVDs would have access to advice on their clinical/performance evaluation strategies from an expert panel.
  • Improved clinical investigation procedures.  The Proposed Regulation seeks to amend the MDR and IVDR to simplify the requirements applicable to clinical investigations of medical devices and performance studies of IVDs where appropriate to do so considering the risks to the study subjects.  For instance:
    • Notably, the Proposed Regulation seeks to streamline the conduct of combined studies involving both medicinal products and medical devices/IVDs.  In such combined studies, the Proposed Regulation provides that the sponsor may submit a single application for authorization, triggering a coordinated assessment, in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 536/2014 on clinical trials (as it is set to be amended under the proposed EU Biotech Act (see our separate blog posts on the EU Biotech Act proposals).
    • With respect to IVDs only, the Proposed Regulation will amend the IVDR so that (i) performance studies involving only routine blood draws will not require prior authorization, and (ii) the notification requirements related to performance studies on companion diagnostics using leftover specimens will be removed.

Separate from the Proposed Regulation, the Commission also recently published a draft Commission Implementing Regulation on quality management and procedural requirements for Notified Body conformity assessment activities.  This aims to introduce uniform rules for Notified Body assessments, including with respect to costs, timelines and transparency of processes.

Please note that this blog is based on the wording of the EU’s proposal published on 16 December 2025.  This wording could significantly change during the legislative process. Our European Life Sciences and MedTech team will continue to monitor this legislation.  Please feel free to reach out to the team with any questions and please keep an eye out for our future updates.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Sarah Cowlishaw Sarah Cowlishaw

Advising clients on a broad range of life sciences matters, Sarah Cowlishaw supports innovative pharmaceutical, biotech, medical device, diagnostic and technology companies on regulatory, compliance, transactional, and legislative matters.

Sarah is a partner in London and Dublin practicing in the areas of EU…

Advising clients on a broad range of life sciences matters, Sarah Cowlishaw supports innovative pharmaceutical, biotech, medical device, diagnostic and technology companies on regulatory, compliance, transactional, and legislative matters.

Sarah is a partner in London and Dublin practicing in the areas of EU, UK and Irish life sciences law. She has particular expertise in medical devices and diagnostics, and on advising on legal issues presented by digital health technologies, helping companies navigate regulatory frameworks while balancing challenges presented by the pace of technological change over legislative developments.

Sarah is a co-chair of Covington’s multidisciplinary Digital Health Initiative, which brings together the firm’s considerable resources across the broad array of legal, regulatory, commercial, and policy issues relating to the development and exploitation of digital health products and services.

Sarah regularly advises on:

obligations under the EU Medical Devices Regulation and In Vitro Diagnostics Medical Devices Regulation, including associated transition issues, and UK-specific considerations caused by Brexit;
medical device CE and UKCA marking, quality systems, device vigilance and rules governing clinical investigations and performance evaluations of medical devices and in vitro diagnostics;
borderline classification determinations for software medical devices;
legal issues presented by digital health technologies including artificial intelligence;
general regulatory matters for the pharma and device industry, including borderline determinations, adverse event and other reporting obligations, manufacturing controls, and labeling and promotion;
the full range of agreements that span the product life-cycle in the life sciences sector, including collaborations and other strategic agreements, clinical trial agreements, and manufacturing and supply agreements; and
regulatory and commercial due diligence for life sciences transactions.

Sarah has been recognized as one of the UK’s Rising Stars by Law.com (2021), which lists 25 up and coming female lawyers in the UK. She was named among the Hot 100 by The Lawyer (2020) and was included in the 50 Movers & Shakers in BioBusiness 2019 for advancing legal thinking for digital health.

Sarah is also Graduate Recruitment Partner for Covington’s London office.

Photo of Dr. Dr. Adem Koyuncu Dr. Dr. Adem Koyuncu

Adem Koyuncu is double qualified as a lawyer and medical doctor and a partner in our Brussels and Frankfurt office. He is a chair of the firm’s “Food, Drug & Device” practice group and also a member of our Compliance practice. Adem is…

Adem Koyuncu is double qualified as a lawyer and medical doctor and a partner in our Brussels and Frankfurt office. He is a chair of the firm’s “Food, Drug & Device” practice group and also a member of our Compliance practice. Adem is recognized as a “leading lawyer for pharma and medical devices law” (JUVE).

Adem is a life sciences industry advisor with more than 25 years of professional experience. He has a broad practice that cuts across regulatory, compliance, IP, privacy and liability matters. Adem also provides strategic advice. He knows the life sciences sector also from his earlier work in the pharmaceutical industry and as a medical doctor. He represents clients before courts and authorities and assists them in contract negotiations, investigations and transactions. For years, Adem is listed in various lawyer rankings.

See some Accolades from Clients and Surveys:

“Adem Koyuncu is one of the most intelligent lawyers I know.” (Legal 500 2023)
“He is one of the most detail-oriented and client-focused partners I have ever encountered.” (Client, Chambers 2021)
“Great professional and human competence, good team player.” (Client/Adverse Party, JUVE 2022)
“I find him to be one of the most pragmatic regulatory lawyers. He was a doctor before a lawyer, has been in-house, worked on lots of stuff that I have to handle in-house, which helps when getting advice. He is really good at saying it’s a complex situation and your best option is to do this.” (Chambers 2022)
“He always comes through with extremely helpful advice. He brings a unique understanding and experience to his practice as both a lawyer and medical doctor.” (Chambers 2021)
“He is an excellent dispute resolution lawyer and advises at the highest level, including, in particular, strategic advice.” (Legal 500 2023)
“He is very sharp and quick, while at the same time having a good sense of humor and nerves of steel. Very pleasant to work with.” (Legal 500 2022)
He is described as “versatile competent, reliable and high quality” (JUVE 2021) and “incredibly fast.” (JUVE 2018)
Provides advice at “an outstanding level.” (Legal 500 2015)
“Very strong negotiation skills.” (JUVE 2011)
Clients appreciate his “very broad knowledge and long-standing expertise” (JUVE 2021/22) and that “he is approachable, knowledgeable and really easy to talk to over the various issues. He is calm and has seen most problems before.” (Chambers 2020)
Peer lawyers described him as “highly competent” and a “very good and pleasant lawyer” (JUVE 2014) and as “the off-label-guru, substantively very good, creative.” (JUVE 2022)

Adem is the author of numerous publications (e.g., in leading books on pharma law, product liability and clinical trials) and frequent speaker at different events. As such, he will soon speak at following events:

Speaker at webinar “Germany Life Sciences Update – Spotlight: Clinical Trials,” (9/12/2025)
“The new EU Product Liability Directive and its implications for pharmaceutical companies and their compliance officers,” 33th AKG Compliance Officer-Meeting (in German), Berlin (11/26/2025)
“The Information Officer – Responsible Person under § 74a AMG,” Seminar, Munich (February 3, 2026)

Photo of Roderick Dirkzwager Roderick Dirkzwager

Roderick Dirkzwager advises clients in the life sciences sector on a broad range of regulatory, transactional and intellectual property matters relating to the discovery, development and commercialization of their products.

Roderick is a member of Covington’s Diversity and Inclusion Committee and is a…

Roderick Dirkzwager advises clients in the life sciences sector on a broad range of regulatory, transactional and intellectual property matters relating to the discovery, development and commercialization of their products.

Roderick is a member of Covington’s Diversity and Inclusion Committee and is a co-lead of the LGBT+ Affinity Group in London.

With a broad life sciences practice, Roderick regularly advises on:

EU, Irish, and UK regulatory issues relating to pharmaceutical products and medical devices;
commercial agreements that span the product life-cycle in the life sciences sector, including collaborations and other strategic agreements, clinical trial agreements, distribution arrangements and manufacturing and supply contracts;
regulatory and commercial due diligence for life sciences transactions; and
intellectual property issues arising in corporate transactions and IP-related contracts.

Roderick is also a member of Covington’s Life Sciences in Africa team and advises clients on regulatory and commercial strategies for the supply of medical products across Africa, including through international recognition procedures such as WHO pre-qualification. Prior to joining the firm, Roderick completed his Ph.D. in Biochemistry, focusing on the development of novel, low-cost malaria diagnostic technologies using DNA aptamers.

Photo of Dan Spivey Dan Spivey

Dan Spivey is an associate in the Life Sciences Regulatory team. Dan advises clients in the pharmaceutical, healthcare, medical device, and food and beverage sectors on a range of regulatory matters.